CCMIN010785 - Laserfiche WebLink

After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that Ordinance No. 1174, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving AP-84-19, appeal by Ponderosa Homes of a decision of the Planning Commission denying PUP-84-17; and approving PUP-84-17, application of Ponderosa Homes for PUP (Planned Unit Development) zoning and development plan approval to con- struct a 250 unit single-family residential project on an approximately S1 acre site located on the west side of Camino Segura, between the residences on the north side of Hansen Drive and the Pleasanton Canal, subject to all conditions contained in Staff Report 85:10, but amending Condition No. ! to add the date of January 4, 1985, to re- flect the date of the revised development plan, and removing Condition No. 2 as it is no longer necessary; and with Area A to be 5,000 sq. ft. lot units and Area B to be 6,500 sq. ft. lot units, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None PUD-81-30-25D, Application of the Koll Company f0F design review for a four building, 150,664 sq. ft.,.Fesearch and development complex on an approximately 11.4 acre site l~Sa~gd. o~ ~he. Dor~eFly corner at Stoneridge Drive and West Las Positas Boulevard. Zoning for the property is PUP (Planned Unit Development)-Industrial,..~.gmmercial and Office District Mr. Harris presented his report (SR 85:06) dated January 7, 1985, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. Mr. Dave Houge, representing the Koll Company, presented a brief background of the business history of this company. He stated the application was approved by Planning Commission by a 3-2 vote. He advised that Planning Com~nission was concerned about parking spaces being in excess of the Hacienda Business Park CC&R's; the build- ing on West Las Positas being too long; the realignment of the deceleration lanes on Stoneridge Drive; and the view of the rear roll up doors. Mr. Randy McCord, representing DKS Associates, addressed the parking concerns; stating that the project will be 20-S0% office use with low density parking demands. Mr. Hauge advised they have received a variance from the Hacienda Business Park Owners Association approving the parking ratio'as presented. Mr. Robert Bernstein, the project architect, presented site plan and color scheme. He addressed the concern of the Planning Commission relative to the length~of Building Two, which they felt was too long. -He stated there are two alternatives: (1) recess- the center three bays for a length of 72 feet which allows a larger plaza area and more landscaping; or (2) keep the original configuration but take out one 24 foot unit and ~dd more landscaping. He advised that he ppefers Alternate One. Ms. Cathv Deino, POD, landscape anchitect, reviewed the landscaping plans and-pre- Bnted renderings showing the concept. Mr. Chris Kinzel, representing TJKM Trafic Consultants, addressed the traffic ~ncerns. He stated that provisions are being made for the street improvements for ~e proposed Stoneridge extension intersection. With regard to the deceleration lane West Las Positas Boulevard, the driveway in question has been moved thereby pro-. ding more adequate lanes. No one.in the audience spoke in opposition to this item. lo. 1/7/s5