CCMIN121685 - Laserfiche WebLink

Parcel 16 - Various Owners: There was no public testimony and the consensus was to add a "Specific Plan" designation to the downtown area. Parcel 18 - PG&E: Mr. Lee pointed out that PG&E plans to put a substation on this property. There was no public testimony and the consensus was to redesignate 12.3 acres from C&O to P&I. Parcel 19 - County: Mr. John Fenstermacher, Alameda County, 399 Elmhurst, Hayward, said they were looking to provide services for groups in the Pleasanton/Livermore area such as a multi-service center and if we redesignate the property, we are taking away the ability of the County to provide services. Councilmember Wood asked if it would be more negotiable leaving it as it is. Mr. Fenstermacher answered that it would. The consensus was to retain this parcel as C&O. Parcel 21 - New Life Church: David Theobald, Pastor of New Life Church, 3200 Hopyard Road, Pleasanton, stated that they may move the church and they would like the designation to remain High Density Residential in order that low cost housing or senior citizen housing might be built. The consensus was to retain this parcel as HDR. Parcel 22 - Saint Clare's Church et al: There was no public testimony and the consensus was to redesignate from HDR to P&I. Parcel 23 - Various Owners: There was no public testimony and the consensus was to retain this parcel as PH&S. Parcel 23A - Lin: Mr. Ted Fairfield said long term use of this property does not suggest rapid development. Parcel 23B - Lund: Mr. Vic Lund, Pleasanton, also felt that the redesignation to RDR would make sensible use of the land. Parcels 23C and 23D: There was no public testimony regarding these parcels. Parcel 23E: Mr. A1 Spotorno, P.O. Box 487, Pleasanton, supported redesignation to RDR. There was a consensus that Parcels 23A, 23B, 23C, 23D, and 23E be redesignated to RDR. Northeast Pleasanton Parcel 24 - Various Owners: Mr. Adolph Martinelli, Assistant Planning Director of Alameda County, spoke on behalf of Staples - 11 -