Laserfiche WebLink
269 <br />and transmission line project will have a significant effect upon the environ- <br />ment of Pleasanton aesthetically~ economically, and the project has generated <br />substantial public controversy over the environmental effects, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Bu{l~'~, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Mercer <br /> <br />Minor Modification to PUD-81-30~ Site 12A~ Hacienda Business Park <br /> R April 7 1986, regarding <br /> Mr, Swift presented his report (I 86:24) dated , <br />this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. <br /> <br />Fire and Life Safety Inspection - Pleasanton Police Holdi Room <br /> Mr. Walker presented the report of the'Fire Marshal (~ 86:25) dated April <br />8, 1986, regarding this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on <br />the item. <br /> <br />Minor Change to Consultant Agreement with Camp, Dresser and McKee~ Inc., <br />NOrth Pleasanton Water"Assessment District <br /> Mr. Okamura presented his report (IR 86:28) dated April 15, 1986, regard- <br />ing this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. <br /> <br />Tri-Valley Wastewater Authority Environmental Revie Advisory Committee <br /> Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 86:157) dated April 15, i986, regard- <br />ing this matter. <br /> <br /> After discussion, Council determined that a City staff member should rep- <br />resent Pleasanton on the Environmental Review Advisory Committee. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />Draft Valle Avenue Extensi'on Agreement (Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company) <br /> Mr. Macdonald presented his report (SR 86:156) dated April 10, 1986, <br />regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, <br />that Resolution No. 86-173, approving the agreement between the City of <br />Pleasanton and Kaiser Sand and Gravel Company for the Valley Avenue Extension, <br />be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Mercer <br /> <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br /> Mr. Walker presented a letter from the Alameda Countywide Transportation <br />Advisory Committee regarding solicitation of candidate transportation projects <br />for consideration for a possible voter approved 1/2 cent sales tax. He stated <br />there would have been a substantial delay to have input from Council so he <br />directed the City's consultant to write a letter for Mr. Walker's signature, <br />asking that consideration be given to the 1-580/I-680 Interchange. He stated <br />that Council might want to reaffirm that. Council went on record in favor of <br />the 1-580/I-680 interchange to be considered as a transportation project for <br />possible voter approval of the 1/2 cents sales tax. <br /> <br /> - 14 4-15-86 <br /> <br /> <br />