My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080586
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
CCMIN080586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:50:35 AM
Creation date
11/5/1999 11:16:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
485 <br /> Mr. Joe Callahan, Callahan Pentz Properties, stated his company is the <br /> seller of the property to Prometheus Development Company, and he is'pleased <br /> with the quality of the proposed project. He asked that Council give consid- <br /> eration to the applicant's request for concurrent approval for a low income <br /> exemption from the Growth Management Program' in order to accommodate the in- <br /> creased units. In ~ddition, the applicant is seeking approval to modify the <br /> guidelines under which the lower income portion of the proposed 456 unit proj- <br /> ect are rented, as follows: (1) that only 15% of the total 456 unit project be <br /> offered at a lower income rate as opposed to 25%; (2) that the below market <br /> rents be offered for only 10 years instead of 15 years; and (3) that the Tri- <br />-- Valley Median Income rate be used. He advised that the subdivision improve- <br /> ment costs are far more than in any other part of town. Mr. Callahan empha- <br /> sized the advantages of high density in a commercial area, but stated that the <br /> cost of land acquisition and participation in various assessment districts <br /> will make the costs prohibitive unless exemptions and rezoning are allowed. <br /> <br /> No one in the audience spoke in opposition to the item. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Brandes declared the public hear- <br /> ing closed on the application and the negative declaration. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes stated this is a unique situation to provide housing in a <br /> commercial area thereby reducing traffic and providing housing that is not <br /> welcome in residential areas of the city. He advised he has no problem with <br /> the guideline modifications and felt they should be included as standards for <br /> all apartment housing. <br /> <br /> Council discussion ensued regarding the lower-income set-aside and from <br /> what source these allocations would be provided from. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer stated there is a lot of benefit to putting apartment <br /> housing in North Pleasanton; it will cut down on traffic, and provide high <br /> density type housing needed in Pleasanton. He stated it is difficult for a <br /> developer to develop in North Pleasanton because of the higher costs unless <br /> some kind of a break is given. He stated that Council has to provide <br />-- incentives for high density development to occur; North Pleasanton allows a <br /> unique opportunity to permit that. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated she has a problem with the low income ratio <br /> change and could not like to vote in favor of the project without additional <br /> information regarding this matter. She stated that Council should consider <br /> changing the mediun low income ratio to the Tri-Valley level on all growth <br /> management program applications. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that <br /> Resolution No. 86-372, determining on the basis of a review of initial en- <br /> vironmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental <br /> impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a Negative <br /> Declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-85-17, application of Pro- <br /> metheus Development Company for a major modification to an approved develop- <br /> ment plan to allow for the development of a 456 unit multi-family residential <br /> complex, to be located on an approximately 16.3 acre site in the area bounded <br /> by Andrews Drive, Owens Drive, Old Santa Rita Road, and Tassajara Creek, be <br /> adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Mercer, Mohr, and Mayor Brandes <br /> <br /> - 8 8-5-86 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.