My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN121686
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
CCMIN121686
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:50:35 AM
Creation date
11/5/1999 11:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
319 <br /> <br />Mr. Innes for the plaque and commended him for his leadership in this out- <br />standing community event. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bill Stansell, 2368 Gloria Court, stated he appeared before Council in <br />October asking for assistance in enforcing the conditions of Ordinance No. 919 <br />adopted in 1979 regarding maintenance of the property adjacent to Twelve Oaks <br />development. He advised the time allotment for construction of the improve- <br />ments has come and gone; the rainy season is near and he is concerned that <br />nothing has been done to improve the drainage system. He asked the City to do <br />whatever is necessary to implement the conditions of the ordinance as soon as <br />possible. <br /> <br /> Mr. MacDonald stated this matter is being handled by the Assistant City <br />Attorney, who has been ill the last two days. He advised that a letter was <br />sent to the Twelve Oaks Homeowners Association, after inspection by the City <br />inspectors, requiring three additional conditions and requesting the work be <br />done by December 12, 1986. He stated the work required by the three addition- <br />al conditions has not been done. The Homeowners Association has claimed to <br />staff that the ground was too wet to complete the work. He advised the addi- <br />tional conditions would cost approximately $5,000.00; and that the Twelve Oaks <br />Homeowners has stated that they would cooperate to comply with the PUD. He <br />suggested that additional information is necessary before the City could ini- <br />tiate enforcement actions on the PUD conditions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stansell stated that if the City cannot enforce this condition of the <br />Ordinance he would like to have a letter to that effect sent to him for his <br />records. He added he could not rely on good faith any longer. <br /> <br /> Mr. Frank Capilla, #9 Twelve Oaks Drive, Vice President of the Twelve Oaks <br />Homeowners Association, and Mr. Bill Gibson, #8 Twelve Oaks Drive, President <br />of the Association, stated they have turned this matter over to their Attorney <br />and Insurance representatives. Mr. Capilla stated the problem is not that <br />there is work to be done but who is to do it. He stated it is the Homeowners <br />contention that compliance with this condition is not their responsibility, <br />and their Attorney has recommended denial of the claim. He stated the problem <br />developed when Gloria Court Was constructed; he felt some of the responsibili- <br />ty belongs to the property owners of Gloria Court, or to the original <br />developer. He stated he felt Twelve Oaks Homeowners Association is cooperat- <br />ing to get a resolution %6 the problem. <br /> <br /> After considerable discussion, Mayor Mercer instructed staff to prepare a <br />complete report regarding this matter for consideration by Council at their <br />meeting of January 6, 1987. He requested this item be placed as item 6a on <br />the agenda. <br /> <br /> Ms. Donna Million, representing the Mohr House Restoration Committee, <br />presented an update on the Mohr House. She advised that the proposed agree- <br />ment with the non-profit corporation and the owner is non-applicable since the <br />house will not be moved to a different location in the area. She stated the <br />non-profit corporation feel it would be appropriate for the City to negotiate <br />with the current owner to secure the deed to the house and land, then enter <br />into a lease back agreement with the Mohr House Restoration Committee for the <br />house. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated he did not recall Council taking any formal <br /> action regarding the Mohr House restoration project; he advised that Council <br /> <br /> 4 - 12-16-86 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.