CCMIN111886 - Laserfiche WebLink

267 Councilmember Brandes stated he felt this property should be in the ten year urban land reserve. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1287, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving RZ-86-10, application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone the TMI and Mason property to PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Low Density Residential; the Gartung, Stevenson and Oleson prop- erties to R-1-40; and the Wells Fargo Bank, Curdy, and Messa parcels to Agriculture, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, and Mayor Mercer NOES: Councilmember Brandes ABSENT: None RZ-86-11, Application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone an approximately 246 acre site to the PUD (Planned Unit DevelopmentI-High Density/Low Density/ Rural Density Residential District located on both sides of Old Dublin Canyon Road, generally in the area approximately 4,800 feet west of the intersection of Foothill Road and Old Dublin Canyon Road Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 86:498) dated November 12, 1986, regarding this matter. Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application and the negative declaration. Messrs. John Ferreri and Duncan Mattison, development partners, stated they concur with the staff report. Mr. Brad Hirst, 2456 Minivet Court, representing the Panganiban property, urged adoption of staff recommendations in compliance with the General Plan. Mr. Charles B. Snow, 39155 Liberty Street, Fremont, Attorney representing Harold and William Kolb, spoke in opposition to the negative declaration, stating there would be adverse impacts from this development caused by inade- quate drainage and increased traffic. He presented a letter to Council defin- ing the negative impacts. He asked that rezoning not be approved until fur- ther study to resolve these problems. Mayor Mercer advised that these issues should be presented at the time of development plan approval, not at the rezoning application. Mr. Lewis, Dublin Canyon Road, stated there is an easement on his property that is being used by trucks and other traffic going to the Schwerin property. Mayor Mercer stated that the City cannot enforce rights on private property but the owner has the right to prosecute trespassers. He suggested Mr. Lewis meet with Mr. Levine, Attorney for the Schwerin property. There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed on the application and the negative declaration. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember But- ler, that Resolution No. 86-540, determining on the basis of a review of ini- tial environmental study done for this project, that no significant environ- mental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a 10 - 11-18-86