Laserfiche WebLink
133 <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler asked if the partner of Valley Memorial Hospital <br />would be able to proceed with the project if for some reason Valley Memorial <br />Hospital chose at a later date not to participate in the final phase. Mr. <br />Fish advisd the other party involved in this project wilt have the ability to <br />proceed alone. He stated that agreements between the two partners contains <br />language to allow that to happen. He stated the Valley Memorial Hospital <br />Board of Directors are unanimously in Support of the first.phase and he sees <br />no problem with continuing in the partnership to full build out. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gene Broadman, Chairman of the Valley Memorial Hospital Board of Di- <br />rectors, stated they have again reviewed this project and are unanimously com- <br />mited to build the project. They believe this is a new era of health care~and <br />the project will supply medical services and leadership for the entire Valley. <br />He asked for approval of the project. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes asked what would happen to this project if another hospital <br />were built in the area before the Valley Memorial Hospital complex was con- <br />structed. Mr. Fish stated the first facility built will have an advantage; he <br />felt their hospital will be the first one constructed. <br /> <br /> Mayor Brandes asked what assurance the City could get for actual construc- <br />tion of the acute care hospital.-Mr. Fish stated the Board of Directors has <br />adopted a resolution calling for development of this project in phases. He <br />stated essentially the only thing standing in the way was a regional develop- <br />ment plan and membership approval committing financial support. <br /> <br /> Mr. David Sealey, representing Alta Bates Hospital, partner in the proj- <br />ect, stated they would not have become a partner if they felt the project <br />would not be completed to ultimate build out. He stated it is logical the <br />build the hospital in phases, as presented, because the support services are <br />necessary as a anchor to the hospital facility and are needed in the first <br />phase. He stated it is their intent, along with Valley Memorial Hospital, <br />that the execution of the project can proceed as early as possible, depending <br />on demand and economics. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Brandes declared the public hear- <br />ing closed on the application and negative declaration. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, <br />that Resolution No. 86-480, determining on the basis of a review of initial <br />environmental study done for this project, that no significant environmental <br />impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and that a negative <br />declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-86-11, application of Valley <br />Memorial Hospital for rezoning from "P" (Public and Institutional) to PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development)-Public and Institutional District and development <br />plan approval for an approximately 488,000 square foot medical center complex <br />consisting of offices, behaioral medicine, skilled nursing, residential, acute <br />ambulatory acre, and related facilities to be constructed in four phases, to <br />be located on an approximately 27.7 acre site, located at the northwest corner <br />of the intersection of Satna Rita Road and West Las Positas Boulevard, be <br />adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Brandes <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 10 - 10-7-86 <br /> <br /> <br />