CCMIN091686 - Laserfiche WebLink

177 This would be developed at just under 11 units per acre, which is only two units to the acre higher tgan the new designation for medium density residen- tial. The mix would be 128 one bedroom units and 152 two bedroom units. The project will include recreational amenities. He stated the development plan, which has been reviewed and revised by staff, is the best and the most suitable plan for this site. Mr. Ferreri asked for approval of the Maximum development alternative for Parcel 2A. After discussion, it was moved by Mayor Brandes, and seconded by Council- member Wood, that Parcel 2A - Ferreri, 25.0 acres be High Density Residential in the General Plan. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Parcel 2B Presley Mr. Mike McKissick, 1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Walnut Creek, representing Presley Development Company, stated that Presley of Northern California has currently proposed a plan on the Schwerin property, a 269 acre parcel for 400 units, single-family detached. That plan has dealt with a lot of the sensi- tive issues of the site with major emphasis on the retention of the riparian areas and has produced an overall density of one and one-half units per acre. Mr. McKissick requested that the site be general planned as low density residential over the 269 acre parcel, and at the time they bring in a specific plan for the site then then the merits or demerits of that plan can be an- alyzed under the PUD process. The primary disadvantage of the staff report is a precedent for medium density residential west of Foothill Road and that is not their request; they want low density residential west of Foothill Road. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that Parcel 2B Presley, 280.0 acres, be designated as low density residential on the general plan. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and MayoF Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Parcel 2C - Moller Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 62 West Neal Street, representing the Moller prop- erty owners, asked if this parcel is included in the Study District. Mayor Brandes advised that it is included in the Study District. No further action was taken on Parcel 2C - Moller Parcel 2D - Beratlis Mr. Bill Hirst, Attorney representing nine property owners, stated they are in a quandry right now because they have had for 3-3-1/2 months a full blown land use application on file, and paid their fees. The only reason Council has not heard it is that staff expects a directed EIR which they are in the process of providing. He stated they are well within the existing general plan density using the one dwelling unit per five acre test. When applied to their 230 acre parcel that produces between 45-46 dwelling units, however, the effect of the staff recommendation under the proposed general plan litterally wipes them out. It reduces them to 12 dwelling units. They do not feel this is fair, primarily because of the fact that this property has - 17 - 9-16-86