CCMIN090286 - Laserfiche WebLink

105 It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 86-419, accepting the report by Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., entitled "Preliminary Design Report, Storm Drainage Improvements within the St. Mary's Creek Watershed" dated August 1986; directing staff to proceed with the design of Alternative 4, Detention Basin Construction and retain the necessary consultants to prepare the plans and specifications; and directing staff to add this project to the 1986-87 Capital Improvement Program and delay Projects 11 and 13 in the 1986-87 CIP, Miscellaneous Projects to a future year, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Brandes NOES: None ABSENT: None Matters for the Information of the Council Councilmember Mercer suggested that this item, on future agendas, be moved up at the end of the Consent Calendar, so that people waiting to 'comment on these items would not have to wait until the end of the meeting. Three Month Agenda Planning Report Mr. Walker presented the Three Month Agenda Planning Report for the infor- mation of Council. Minor Modification to Case 85-12, Stonedale Townhouses (PUD-85-12-2M) Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 86:71) dated August 19, 1986, regarding this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. Minor Modification to Case PUD-84-11, 123 Ray Street (PUD-84-11-2M} Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 86:72) dated September 2, 1986, regard- ing this matter. Councilmember Mercer expressed concern about removing the wood to be re- placed with stucco, stating this will create one big wall of stucco; and the revised elevations. Minor Modification to PUD-81-30-9D, Site 18A of Hacienda Business Park (PUD- 81-30-9D-1M} Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 86:76) dated September 2, 1986, regard- ing this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. Status of Non-Residential School Impact Fee Mr. MacDonald presented his report (IR 86:74) dated August 28, 1986, regarding this matter. After discussion, Council determined to consider the nonresidential school impact fee at the meeting when the North Pleasanton Im- provement District Freeway District is again considered. Report from PG&E on Requested Utility Pole Removals Foothill Boulevard South of Stoneridge Drive Mr. Elliott presented his report (IR 86:73) dated September 2, 1986, regarding this matter. He advised that PG&E called him this date stating they have concluded their preliminary engineering investigations and have arrived at an estimate of $22,500.00 to relocate the poles, and stating they would be willing to proceed but they expect the City of Pleasanton to bear the costs. 5 - 9-2-86