Laserfiche WebLink
The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, <br />that Ordinance No. 1309, to be read by title only and waiving further reading <br />thereof, and after finding that the development is consistent with the General <br />Plan and purposes of the PUD Ordinance, approve PUD-86-12, application of Pon- <br />derosa Industries, Inc., for development plan approval for a 111-unit single- <br />family residential development to be located on an approximately 13.4 acre <br />site located in the area bounded by Paseo Santa Cruz, Via de los Cerros, and <br />Camino Segura, subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission <br />Resolution No. 87-34, be introduced. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />PUD-87-3, Application of Trammell Crow Company and Callahan, Sweeney, and <br />O'Brien for development plan approval for a 212-unit apartment complex, to be <br />located on an approximately 7.6 acre site located in the area bounded by Owens <br />Drive, West Las Positas Boulevard, the abandoned Southern Pacific Transporta- <br />tion Company railroad right-of-way, and Tassajara Creek. Zoning for the prop-. <br />erty is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Hi~h Density Residential District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing Open on this item, and continued <br />it until after the joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission <br />on May 4, 1987, as determined by Council earlier in this meeting. <br /> <br />AP-87-5, Appeal of Ken Gooch and Associates of a decision of the Plannin9 Com- <br />mission denying Case PUD-86-19, the application of Gooch and Associates and <br />Harry Caldwell for development plan approval for a 20-unit residential project <br />to be located on an approximately two acre site located at 3745 Vineyard <br />Avenue. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Den- <br />sity Residential District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration <br />~Contd. Open from 4-7-87) <br /> <br />AP-87-6, Appeal of Ken Gooch and Associates of a decision of the Planning Com- <br />mission denying Case PUD-86-20, application of Gooch and Associates and Sylvia <br />Riccio for development plan approval for a 40-unit residential project to be <br />located on an approximately 3.7 acre site, located at 3759 Vineyard Avenue. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Medium Density <br />Residential District <br /> <br />Consider Adoption of Negative Declaration <br /> (Contd. Open from 4-7-87) <br /> Councilmember Mohr abstained from participation on this item because of <br />Conflict of Interest based upon having sold two units in Phase I of this <br />project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 87:171) dated April 21, 1987, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> - 18- 4-21-87 <br /> <br /> <br />