CCMIN010687 - Laserfiche WebLink

375 Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1296, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving RZ-86-14, application of the City of Pleasanton to amend the Municipal Code to allow six foot high wrought-iron, split rail or other similar type fencing within the required front yard setbacks in the R-1- 20,000, R-1-40,000 (Single-family Residential) and the "A" (Agricultural) Dis- tricts, be introduced. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were no matters continued for decision prsented at this meeting. REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS There were no reports of Boards and Commissions presented at this meeting. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Resolutions Amending Application to LAFCO for Annexation No. 115 and Agreeing to the Exchange of Property Tax Revenue and Initiating Prezoning (Adding Otto and Lewis Properties) Mr. Elliott presented his report (SR 87:15) dated January 6, 1987, regarding this matter. He advised that one protest had been received tonight from Mr. Don Otto. Mr. MacDonald stated that Council could proceed with the annexation and present the protest to LAFCO along with the application. Mr. Don Otto, Dublin Canyon Road, stated he objected to being annexed into the City because he did not know how this was going to affect him. He stated he has concerns regarding road changes and drainage as well as how much the annexation is going to cost him and any future assessments against his proper- ty. Mayor Mercer advised him the surrounding property can be developed, whether in the County or in the City; the City has control of what type development and the conditions of approval if the property is annexed to the City. Mr. Otto stated he filed the protest on the advice of his attorney. Mr. John Ferreri, 6330 Laura Lane, applicant for Annexation No. 115, stated he was surprised by the protest; he had met with Mr. and Mrs. Otto and thought they concurred with the annexation. He advised that Alameda County felt the Otto and Lewis property should be included in the annexation applica- tion for continuity. He stated he is willing to meet with Mr. Otto and his attorney to indemnify their concerns. He added this annexation will not have any cost to the Otto's because of the development. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Butler, that Resolution No. 87-16, amending the application to LAFCO for Annexation No. 115 to include the Otto and Lewis properties, and forwarding the protest of Mr. Otto with the application to LAFCO; Resolution No. 87-17, agreeing to the exchange of property tax revenue in connection with amended Annexation No. 115 adding the Otto and Lewis properties; and Resolu- tion No. 87-18, initiating prezoning for the amended Annexation No. 115, add- ing the Otto and Lewis properties, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brands, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer 20 - 1-6-87