CCMIN111787 - Laserfiche WebLink

G9 that because he wants to build a quality neighborhood shopping center in con- formance with community standards. He hired TJKM Traffic Consultants who pre- pared an extensive report, working directly with city staff without any inter- mediation from Connolly Development. 'They answered the short term needs and well as prepared a long term master plan. TJKM came up with the facts, fig- ures and projections so that city staff could come up with the recommendation submitted in the staff report presented tonight. He added this improvement will cost $300,000 more to build the shopping center but it will make a better center and will attract quality merchants. Mr. Murphy concluded by stating it is his opinion that the approved plan by the Design Review Board is for the good of the many citizens of Pleasanton. Mr. Lou Helgeson, 872 Abbie, owner of business at 5587 Sunol Boulevard, stated he is concerned about the safety of his employees; he felt a traffic signal would be the most worthwhile and effective traffic control. Mr. Ted Fairfield, 2333 Woodthrush, with business at 5510 Sunol Boulevard, stated he was the project manager when this area was first developed in the early 1960's. Junipero was designed and built as a collector street, and the reason that an intersection was not built at that time at Junipero and Sunol is because the City had no traffic lights and it was City policy not to have them. He stated the right turn compromise suggested does a lot of violation to a lot of people; it will create many u-turns per day, and will create per- manent short cuts going through parking lots. If a left turn at the shopping center is approved it would be the same thing for people wanting to get into Junipero from Sunol. He stated the traffic report is comprehensive. He com- mended Connolly for being willing to spend money for this improvement. He added that a full intersection will maximum safety and do away with u-turns. It will not increase traffic on Junipero significantly, and will slow traffic speeds on Sunol Boulevard. He supported the Design Review Board's decision. Mr. Alfred Letser, 227 Mission Drive, stated he supports the recommenda- tion of the Planning Department. Mr. Chris Kinsel, TJKM TrafficConsultants, stated he was asked by staff to prepare a study which took into account the long term needs of the City along Sunol Boulevard, one in which improvements that would be appropriate at this time would fit in. He was more concerned with the spacing of potential signals, taking into account existing intersections and the proposed Valley Avenue extension. Looking at all alternatives he felt Junipero is the most logical location; it would not be in conflict with the Valley Avenue exten- sion, would serve the shopping center, and would allow future access to prop- erty on the west side of Sunol Boulevard. In his view, the plan will serve the short term needs on Sunol Boulevard as well as allow long range consider- ations. He felt the signal at Mission Drive needs to be upgraded to provide maximum safety. Ms. Dorothy Vanbrakel, 230 Mission Drive, stated she is concerned about safety at Sonoma and Mission Drive; if the frontage road is gone Council should consider alternatives. She added that the left turn has always been dangerous. Mr. Soby asked why Somona is so under-utilized. He stated that even if the City goes with the proposed plan with signals at Junipero it will still be a dangerous intersection at Sonoma and Sunol. He felt the best place for a signal for now is at Sonoma and Sunol; it would slow traffic down. 6 - 11-17-87