Laserfiche WebLink
211 <br /> <br />felt it should be a good one and could support the Sparton <br />recommendation. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler said he could support the idea o~ a <br />machine but not the Sparton. He preferred the J. Taylor. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by <br />Councilmember Brandes, that Resolution No. 88-146, approving the <br />purchase of the Sparton Engineering Electronic vote display <br />system for an estimated cost of $10,000, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES; Councilmember Butler <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />item 6b <br />~guest from Alameda Count~_!gE_~!~QQO to .participate in the <br />South Livermore Valley_~pecific Plan <br /> Mr. Walker presented the report dated April 5, 1988, <br />regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, seconded by <br />Councilmember Butler, to reconsider the request ~rom Alameda <br />County for $15,000 to participate in the South Livermore Valley <br />Specific Plan. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and <br /> Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> Council discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of <br />participating in the South Livermore Valley Specific Plan. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, seconded by <br />Councilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 88-147, approving the <br />request from Alameda County for $15,000 to participate in the <br />South Livermore Valley Specific Plan, be adopted. <br /> <br />item e <br />Discussion of Formation of a Library Commission <br /> Mr. Walker presented the report (SR 88:132 dated April 5, <br />1988, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated that he felt the staff report <br />was self-explanatory and felt there was some degree of urgency <br />in regard to the establishment of a Pleasanton Library <br />commission. He urged strong consideration for those people who <br />have worked so hard ~or the library. <br /> <br /> Mr. Warden representing the Library Building Committee, <br />explained they had only suggested that a Library League member <br />be appointed to the Commission subject to approval by the City <br />Council. They had no mechanism to do that. <br /> <br /> Page 5 4-5-88 <br /> <br /> <br />