CCMIN011988 - Laserfiche WebLink

9 Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 88:21) dated January 19, 1988, regarding this matter. Councilmember Wilson had questions concerning the tax revenues. Mr. Lee stated that State law enables cities to elect to contribute certain revenues which would normally accrue to the Community Development Agency to be allocated, instead, to the City. These revenues include tax rate increases, such as special assessments imposed for the benefit of the entire City, after the adoption of the Community Development Plan. Council's decision to contribute these revenues to the City can always be rescinded at a later date, but must be made at this time to meet the March increment. Councilmembers felt an informational meeting regarding the Community Development Agency and its function would be appropri- ate. After discussion, Council instructed staff to schedule a special meeting to review this matter. It was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Coun- cilmember Mohr, that Resolution No. 88-35, electing to be allo- cated certain tax revenues pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None Approval of issues to be addressed in San Francisco Specific Plan Mr. Swift presented his report (SR 88:23) dated January 19, 1988, regarding this matter. Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, Attorney representing the City and County of San Francisco, stated that San Francisco is looking to moving forward with its Specific Plan process; he favored includ- ing the issues in Staff Report 88:23 in the Plan. Mayor Mercer stated he would like to go on record supporting having San Francisco build a golf course. Mayor Mercer asked if the City will have the opportunity for input into the process as the Specific Plan goes along. Mr. In- derbitzen advised that the City will have input into the Specific Plan through Chandler Lee or himself. He advised he did not know the timetable for adoption of the plan. Mayor Mercer asked to be able to meet with San Francisco on a periodic basis to review and make comments on the Specific Plan. Council concurred. After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Brandes, and seconded by Councilmember Wilson, that Resolution No. 88-36, identifying City concerns and requesting that the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission include those issues in the consul- tant's contract for the preparation of a Specific Plan for the 550 acre property shown on the General Plan map, be adopted. The roll call vote was as follows: - 15 - 1-19-88