My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051788
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
CCMIN051788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:11 AM
Creation date
11/3/1999 11:38:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
357 <br /> <br /> declaration is appropriate in connection with the preliminary design for the <br /> cross town sanitary sewer interceptor, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br />C) AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br />(]C) NOES: None <br />Cv} ABSENT: None <br />~ It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Councilmember Mohr, <br />~ that Resolution No. 88-237, approval of preliminary design report for the <br />~ cross town sanitary sewer interceptor, be adopted. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Wilson, and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> There were no matters continued for decision presented at this meeting. <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS <br /> There were no reports of Boards and Commissions presented at this meeting. <br /> <br /> REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br /> item 12a <br /> Consider Amendment to Noise Ordinance Relatinq to Leaf Blowers <br /> Mr. MacDonald presented his report (SR 88:207) dated May 17, 1988, regard- <br /> ing this matter. He stated this ordinance was originally introduced on March <br /> 15, 1988, by a vote of 5-Ayes, and continued from the meeting of April 5, <br /> 1988. He also presented an amended draft ordinance incorporating suggestions <br /> from the Police Department, which requires the use of an Echo PB4500 leaf <br /> blower. This particular blower is much quieter than other blowers. <br /> <br /> Mr. Ron Berkheiser, 1893 Cortez Court, stated he originally brought this <br /> matter to the attention of City Council because of the excessive noise from <br /> leaf blowers at the Amador Shopping Center, which disturbed his sleep. He <br /> questioned the 73 dBA level set forth in the staff report, stating that in his <br /> location the noise level is 63-65 dBA and at that level leaf blower noise cre- <br /> ates an adverse impact. He stated he prefers Livermore's ordinance which <br /> reads as follows: <br /> <br /> "The operation of any noise-creating blower, power fan or internal combus- <br /> tion engine, the operation of which causes noise due to the explosion of <br /> operating gases or fluids is prohibited, unless the noise from such blower <br /> or fan is muffled and such engine is equipped with a muffler device to <br /> deaden such noise in such a manner so as not to be plainly audible at a <br /> distance of either seventy-five feet from the source of the noise, or <br /> between the hours of eleven p.m. to seven a.m." <br /> <br /> Mr. Berkheiser felt this would more adequately address the problem at the Ama- <br /> dor Shopping Center as well as other centers, and he requested that it be <br /> adopted immediately. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tom Dean, 3089 Yuma Way, resident near Nob Hill Shopping Center, <br /> stated he finds blowers from the Center are offensive, especially on weekends. <br /> <br /> Mr. Stan Zerodny, sweeper at the Amador Shopping Center, stated he sym- <br /> pathizes with those who bought homes near shopping centers, airports, and <br /> <br /> 9 - 5-17-88 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.