My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120688
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
CCMIN120688
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 4:41:22 PM
Creation date
11/3/1999 11:26:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/6/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
401 <br /> <br />of the community by carrying out rehabilitation of certain <br />buildings. <br /> <br /> Ms. Getty stated that rather than take people off the list <br />there will probably be a lot of people added to the list. She did <br />not know where that puts the status of most of the downtown area <br />or older buildings that exist throughout the community. She felt <br />time is of the essence because it is adversely affecting a lot of <br />people's lives. At the last meeting the Mayor asked Councilmember <br />Wilson and herself to work with the City Attorney on this. She <br />stated she is still willing to do anything she can to help <br />expedite the procedure. <br /> <br /> Mr. Martin Inderbitzen, 62 W. Neal Street, stated he felt <br />historical buildings can be exempted; it does have a tremendous <br />benefit to buildings that are of historical significance to the <br />community. He encouraged Council to have staff pursue that line <br />of analysis when the final report is prepared. He added he would <br />be willing to help in any way that he could with respect to this <br />ordinance. He stated to say that it is affecting people's <br />livelihood is an understatement; he occupies a building that would <br />most certainly be classified as an unreinforced masonry building <br />and subject to potential mitigation and also represents at least <br />one property owner who is unable to consumate any kind of a <br />transaction with regard to the property because of the uncertainty <br />of how this issue is going to be dealt with. This underscores the <br />time limit and he urged that the matter be considered in due <br />haste. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bill Laude, 830-855 Main Street, stated he is very <br />involved with the Cheese Factory and has had a year of <br />frustrations in dealing with this issue. He stated he would <br />welcome the opportunity to work with whatever committee is formed <br />to get a resolution to the matter. It is very difficult for <br />people to make decisions whether they own buildings or lease space <br />until this issue is resolved. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer asked Mr. Roush to get together with these <br />people as soon as possible to discuss the issue. Mr. Roush stated <br />that in order to expedite the matter he would need a resolution <br />from the Council to go ahead and obtain a consultant, as outlined <br />in the report, to get the process moving so that staff will know <br />what the scope or number of buildings that are affected; until <br />staff knows that information it is difficult for staff to come up <br />with a decent mitigation plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Robert Kortz, 262 West Angela Street, stated he would <br />like to point out that there is AB 604, Division 2 of Health and <br />Safety Code Sections, which there is some state rehabilitation <br />money loans and the public and property owners should be aware <br />that there are many places to get the monies to take care of <br />rehabilitating these buildings instead of going through a <br />redevelopment program. Also, as far as historical structures, <br />historical properties recognized as such by a local, state or <br /> <br /> - 5 - <br /> <br /> 12-6-88 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.