CCMIN120688 - Laserfiche WebLink

403 item 5d Minor Modification to PUD-85-18-1M, KC Development Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 88:89) dated December 6, 1988, regarding this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. item 5e Minor Modification to PUD-83-9-2M, Gatewood Associates Mr. Swift presented his report (IR 88:90) dated December 6, 1988, regarding this matter. No action was required or taken by Council on the item. item 5f Pro~ects Involving Stanley Partners; General Plan Amendment No. 88-6; and Planned Unit Development 88-10 Mr. Roush presented his report (IR 88:86) dated December 6, 1988, stating that because two Councilmembers and the Mayor have investments in Amador Valley Savings and Loan, which is the owner of the property involving this project (items 9a, 9b, and 9c), they have a conflict of interest, therefore, it will be necessary to draw lots to see which Councilmember can participate on the item. He stated the same is also applicable to the Redevelopment Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report (item 9i). Council determined to conduct the drawing at the time the item comes up on the agenda. Senate Bill 547, Building Earthquake Safety Statute; Report No. 2 Mr. Roush presented his report (IR 88:91) dated December 6, 1988, regarding this matter. Ms. Joyce Getty, owner of a building at 500 Main Street, asked what the time frame is for hiring a consultant, if Council approves the report. Mr. Roush stated that if Council directs staff to hire a consultant to undertake this survey', it will take 2-3 months to get the survey done and come up with a proposed mitigation plan. Mayor Mercer asked if there is an exemption process whereby certain building can be exempted. Mr. Roush stated this is difficult to answer; it depends on who you speak with. When he spoke with the author of the Bill, who was with the Seismic Safety Commission, the author's position is that historic buildings, as defined by the local jurisdiction, do not have to be included on this list which is transmitted to the Seismic Safety Commission, but the buildings are not exempted from the mitigation plan. However, the State Historic Building Code is the applicable code which is to be used when these historic buildings are to be remodeled. It will depend on the Council decides is an appropriate mitigation plan as to the extent and to the time frame (to do the corrections) that will be set forth in mitigation plan. All the law mandates is that the City compiles the list and transmit the list to the State Seismic Safety Commission. What Council does with it thereafter there is discretionary, keeping in mind the purpose of the Bill is to provide safety to the residents - 4 - 12-6-88