Laserfiche WebLink
The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr asked that if an exception is made for <br />this project will Council be opening itself up to other requests <br />for extensions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush advised that he is not sure there is anyone else <br />that might be applying for growth management extension. He stated <br />that in this particular instance the developer did have Planning <br />Commission approval before the deadline, and because the matter <br />was continued for reconsideration there is rationale to extend the <br />deadline. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Brandes stated that if the developer had gone <br />along with City Council at the first hearing he would have been in <br />under the deadline. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated the neighbors as well as the developer <br />asked for reconsideration of this application. Since it is an <br />extension of only three days and because of the significant <br />benefit of the school fees to Lydiksen School, he felt it is <br />appropriate to grant the extension. He added that there is no <br />guarantee that Mr. Bridgman will get any growth management <br />allocation for 1990. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by <br />Councilmember Tarver, that Ordinance No. 1413 be introduced, to be <br />read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, extending <br />the deadline for making application for growth management program <br />allocation to June 1, 1989. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Tarver, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Brandes <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />item 9c <br />AP-89-2, Appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission Denying <br />approval of Case PUD-88-14, Application of Presley of Northern <br />California for development plan approval to construct a 194-parcel <br />single-family residential pro~ect to be located on an <br />approximately 271 acre site locataed on the west side of Foothill <br />Road in the area generally north and west of its intersection with <br />Stoneridge Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD fPlanned Unit <br />Development)-Low Density Residential <br /> Mayor Mercer declared this item continued to the meeting of <br />April 18, 1989, 7:30 p.m., in the Pleasanton Council Chambers, at <br />the request of the appellant. The Mayor indicated that this was <br />the last continuance of this matter he would be willing to grant. <br /> <br />item 9d <br />Consideration of Proposed 1989-1993 Capital Improvement Program <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that a work session was held on April 3, <br />1989, regarding this matter. <br /> <br /> - 15 - <br /> 4/04/89 SS <br /> <br /> <br />