Laserfiche WebLink
Item 8c <br /> Affordable Housinq Task Force <br /> Mr. Mercer presented a memorandum briefly outlining his <br /> proposal for the Task Force. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver requested a representative from the Human Services <br /> Commission and from the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes indicated there are people in the community with <br /> different viewpoints on affordable housing and those suggested for <br /> membership on the Task Force are all in favor of affordable <br /> housing. Mr. Brandes feels there should be representation for <br /> those not in favor of affordable housing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer indicated the purpose of this committee is not to <br /> debate whether there should be affordable housing; the state says <br /> you will have affordable housing. The committee is to define what <br /> the affordable or low income housing problem is; to see what other <br /> cities have done; and to advise the Council, who will then make <br /> the decisions on the projects and where to place them. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler wanted to be sure the interests of seniors were <br />protected. Mr. Tarver indicated he would like to participate on <br />the committee. <br /> <br /> There was no action on this item. <br /> <br /> Item 8d <br />Adoption of Tri-Valley Transportation Council Rules of Procedure. <br /> Mr. Mercer presented a memorandum with the proposed rules of <br />procedure attached. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Tarver, seconded by <br />Councilmember Mohr, to adopt Resolution 89-282, adopting the Tri- <br />Valley Transportation Council Rules of Procedure. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver, and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Councilmember Tarver raised a question about the possible <br />need of another geological review of the Golden Eagle project and <br />suggested the USGS be requested to prepare a report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush indicated there can be no action tonight, but the <br />item could be brought back at the next meeting. <br /> <br /> There was then discussion as to whether the whole project <br />would be stopped in view of this request. Mr. Roush indicated it <br />would not unless the Building Official determined there was a <br />need to stop the project. <br /> <br /> -11- <br /> <br /> 6-20-89 <br /> <br /> <br />