Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Terrill replied that the company would make sure of the <br />color before it goes on. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver referred to the traffic study and requested Mr. <br />Terrill to explain further why the general commercial rate was not <br />used as the trip generation rate for the application; why the <br />total number of trips was reduced by 14,000 sq. ft.; why 42% of <br />traffic during peak hours would necessarily be passers-by; and why <br />the trips were distributed so heavily towards Stoneridge Drive, <br />which appears to be out of the way. <br /> <br /> Mr. Terrill replied that the company has owned and managed a <br />majority of the buildings in Pleasanton Park since 1981 and has <br />been doing Transportation Systems Management (TSM) surveys since <br />its inception in 1984. The Home Depot market study suggests that <br />over 50% of its business will be coming from 1-680. There has <br />been a high usage of the Foothill Road direction to exit towards <br />1-680. Customers leaving the site would take Johnson Drive, drive <br />north on Stoneridge Drive to 1-680, which would be shorter and <br />more convenient than driving to Hopyard Road through 1-580 to 1- <br />680. <br /> <br /> The trip rate on a home improvement store is less than the <br />general commercial rate of 4.8. The rate used'on Home Depot is <br />3.8, which was drawn from actual counts at peak hours and during <br />the daytime flow of existing Home Depot stores. The rest of the <br />center is based on the general commercial rate with no deduction <br />for home furnishing/decorating tenants, which would have a low <br />trip rate of 1.5. <br /> <br /> The difference between an 88,000-ft. and a 102,000-ft. store <br />is in aisle widths and the cashier area. This difference creates <br />about 6,000 ft. to 8,000 ft. of sales area; the rest is used for <br />service, customer flow and issues around the front area of the <br />building. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the <br />public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Mr. Butler, that <br />Resolution No. 89-485 be adopted, based on a review of an initial <br />environmental study done for this project and on a finding that no <br />significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the <br />City's guidelines and on a further finding that a negative <br />declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-89-16, the <br />application of Reynolds and Brown for planned unit development <br />modification and development plan approval for a 155,096 sq. ft. <br />mixed use retail center which includes a 101,880 sq. ft. home <br />improvement store, 49,350 sq. ft. of ancillary retail space and a <br />3,500 sq. ft. drive-thru restaurant located at the northwest <br />corner of Owens Drive and Johnson Drive adjoining 1-580. <br /> <br /> -7- <br /> 11-21-89 <br /> <br /> <br />