My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN103189
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
CCMIN103189
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:51:41 AM
Creation date
11/3/1999 10:34:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
429 <br /> <br /> Mr. Bob Abreu, 4653 Del Valle Parkway, also concurred with <br />Mr. Kahale's statements. He added that it would be cost effective <br />to have irrigation pipe lines put in while the contractors are <br />digging to do the landscaping. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes asked staff if there would be substantial savings <br />to combine the two jobs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott replied that there would be some savings. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer stated that he agreed that Del Valle Parkway needs <br />landscaping, but that financing is a stumbling block. He also <br />stated that at the present time, it is not necessary to have a <br />traffic light at the intersection of Valley Avenue and Via de los <br />Milagros/Paseo Santa Cruz, as the existing stop signs there are <br />sufficient for the amount of traffic there. He suggested that the <br />funds for the traffic light, amounting to $175,000, could be used <br />for the landscaping, and when it became necessary to install the <br />traffic lights in a year or two, it could be included in the <br />budget then. He would also like to add landscape improvements in <br />front of the subdivision next to the Sports Plaza on Hopyard <br />Road. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes concurred with Mr. Mercer's statement. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if the contractor for the sewer lines is <br />obligated to replace some of the landscaping and how this would be <br />coordinated with the contract for the east end of Del Valle <br />Parkway. <br /> <br /> Mr. Walker replied that the contractor is required to replace <br />only what he took out. The landscape for the other areas would <br />not be his responsibility. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer inquired if it were possible to deduct the cost to <br />replace the landscape from the sewer lines contract rather than <br />have him redo the landscaping, then take the money and have only <br />one contractor do the entire thing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott explained that it would be appropriate to deduct <br />the costs from the payment still to be made to the sewer line <br />contractor. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler commented that the traffic light would make a <br />better situation out of a bad one that was created when the stop <br />signs were put up in the firs~ place. He stated that the stop <br />signs should not be there at all. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer stated that the stop signs provide a service <br />because they give children the opportunity to cross Valley Avenue <br />into the tennis facility across the street or on their way to <br />school. He added that it would be a mistake to take them out <br />now. <br /> <br /> -9- <br /> 10-31-89 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.