Laserfiche WebLink
301 <br /> <br />connection from Pleasanton Meadows to the Staples Ranch property <br />and provide the same type of access from Martin Avenue to <br />Stoneridge Drive; zone the Chu property as medium density <br />residential for a maximum residential density of eight units per <br />acre; limit the speed on Stoneridge Drive and the residential area <br />behind Pleasanton Meadows to 35 miles per hour; have a seven-foot <br />berm between Pleasanton Meadows and Stoneridge Drive; and expand <br />the proposed park from 40 ft. to 66 ft., with the additional 26 <br />ft. coming from the two lanes to be taken off the proposed six <br />lanes on Stoneridge Drive. This last proposal would increase the <br />recreational aspects in the area and provide a needed buffer <br />between Stoneridge Drive and Pleasanton Meadows. Moreover, the <br />area would always be available should more lanes be needed in the <br />future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer recommended the work done by the Committee and <br />thanked Mr. Haynam for his time, efforts and leadership. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tony Rakocija, 3233 Monmouth Court, stated that the <br />extension of Stoneridge Drive from Santa Rita Road to E1 Charro <br />Road would add to the air pollution in the Valley due to an <br />increase in the number of vehicles travelling through the area. <br />He added that emphasis should be put on alternative means of <br />transport and getting people to use public transportation, as <br />traffic demands can never be satisfied. He then referred to a <br />Newsweek article, "California: American Dream or American <br />Nightmare," and said that this could very well refer to <br />Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Mr. John Boultier, 3440 Vermont Place, indicated his <br />opposition to the Stoneridge Drive extension and to high density <br />in the area because this would mean greater possibility for <br />airplane crashes. He read excerpts from two articles of the <br />August 6th issue of the Herald, one stating that Livermore is the <br />best reliever airport in the Bay Area for taking general aviation <br />traffic away from big international airports in San Francisco, <br />Oakland, and San Jose, and the other that there have been 14 <br />incidents of plane crashes in the Bay Area that house these <br />planes. He mentioned that they live in a very narrow corridor of <br />noise coming from the gravel pits, 1-580, airport traffic, and now <br />the six-lane Stoneridge Drive extension. He added that he received <br />a notice from the Alameda County Flood Control and Water District <br />indicating that the Arroyo would be widened to 7,500 ft. He <br />inquired if the earth and berm and landscaping proposed for south <br />of the Arroyo starts from the point where the Flood Control <br />District says it would be widened or from the point of the <br />original 1988 EIR Report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that Zone 7 is widening the Arroyo to its <br />ultimate planned width and carrying capacity from Santa Rita Road <br />easterly to where it widens out across Pleasanton Meadows. The <br />existing channel was constructed by the original developer with <br />the other half to be built by the south side or Zone 7 from their <br />Surface Drainage Improvement money. Their plan essentially <br /> <br /> -7- <br /> 9-5-89 <br /> <br /> <br />