Laserfiche WebLink
155 <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer replied that he, a member of the Alameda County <br />Board of Supervisors, and some County staff are in the ACTPC. <br />There will also be a 75-member Citizenst Advisory Committee with <br />three representatives from each community in Alameda County to <br />oversee the transportation plan for Alameda County. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Mr. Mercer, to <br />support Assembly Bill No. 2933. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer requested staff to write a letter to Assembly <br />Member Eastin indicating the City's support of the Bill and <br />request some information on the budget for the studies, the <br />interest money, and the inclusion of a sunset provision. <br /> <br />Castlewood Property Annexation Feasibility Study <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer stated that he received a letter from the Board of <br />Directors of the Castlewood Property Owners inquiring about the <br />possibility of City staff meeting with the Board to consider <br />putting together a feasibility study on annexing Castlewood to the <br />City of Pleasanton. The study would cover the advantages and <br />disadvantages of annexation to both Castlewood Homeowners and the <br />City, how much it would cost and how long it would take. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes stated that the study would have to be extensive <br />enough to address some real problems relating to the water system, <br />sewer, streets, and fire protection, among other things and that <br />if Castlewood is interested in annexing, it should pay for the <br />study. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler commented that he sees no problem with City staff <br />meeting with the Board and that the potential advantage of <br />annexation is far more on Castlewood's side than the City's. <br /> <br />9. CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPQRTS <br /> <br /> There were no City Council Committee reports presented at <br />this meeting. <br /> <br /> - 15 - <br /> 3 -6-90 <br /> <br /> <br />