My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN011690
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
CCMIN011690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:34 AM
Creation date
11/3/1999 10:09:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there. However, there is the traffic concern about Foothill Road <br />if there is only one station. In addition, a financing mechanism <br />for a second station in Pleasanton would be more successful if the <br />station is built in Hacienda. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer commented that Supervisor Ed Campbell's idea of <br />forming some kind of assessment district that would provide local <br />money to build a third station is not farfetched. It would be far <br />better to borrow money and pay for it over the years than ask <br />people for more tax money. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler stated that putting together some private <br />financing for a third station would be feasible if there already <br />is a station in East Dublin/Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that <br />Resolution No. 90-13 be adopted, supporting two stations in the <br />Valley; but if only one station must be chosen, Council selects <br />the East Dublin/Pleasanton (Hacienda) site and supports all <br />recommendations in the staff report regarding traffic mitigation <br />relating to the station. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 12d <br />Approval of the Agreement with the Pleasanton Unified School <br />District for Joint Use and Construction of Two Gymnasiums and <br />Ground Lease at 5001 Case Avenue <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush presented his report (SR 90:35) regarding the <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes stated that he had no problem with the agreement, <br />but that he wanted to make sure that the size and layout of the <br />gyms concur with the plan earlier presented to the Council. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver indicated that he would want the layout to come <br />back to Council. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer inquired who would pay for the street work at <br />Harvest Park which involved cutting a median and putting in a <br />parking lot. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian replied that nothing has been decided on this <br />matter. He explained that the School District is aware that the <br />City made a commitment to give a certain amount of money for the <br />projects and that anything in excess of that would be paid for by <br />the District. <br /> <br /> -24- <br /> 1-16-90 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.