CCMIN071790 - Laserfiche WebLink

366 It was then moved by Mr. Brandes, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that the PUD on Lot C allow no retail uses except freestanding restaurants and financial institutions. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmember Brandes, Mohr, and Tarver NOES: Councilmember Butler ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Mayor Mercer Mr. Tarver pointed out that in the Conditions of Approval, the maximum building height for Parcel B should be 22 feet rather than 25 feet and that the intersections listed on Condition No. 10 should be listed under Condition No. 11 as well. Mr. Brandes stated that he found Lot A to be an inappropriate site for a hotel and that it was premature to have another hotel in the City. Ms. Mohr commented that if Council felt that zoning for the property can appropriately accommodate a hotel and subsequently approved its design, the timeliness of whether or not that hotel can be absorbed into the market place would be the applicant's decision. Mr. Butler indicated that he agreed with Mr. Brandes if the hotel would be a large one. However, this would be a small one adjacent to a business park with a reasonable access to the freeway. Mr. Tarver commented that the type and size of the hotel would be appropriate for Pleasanton. Ms. Mohr pointed out that a two-story hotel rather than a three-story one would blend better with the overall design concept in the area. Mr. Brandes inquired what other uses are allowed on Parcel A and what the height restrictions on these other uses are. Mr. Swift replied that the currently approved PUD uses are hotel and restaurant. The proposed uses include a hotel with two pads, which would include a restaurant and either financial or retail. Mr. Brandes agreed with Ms. Mohr that a smaller, two-story hotel would be acceptable, with a restaurant but no financial use. 7-17-90 - 18 -