CCMIN071090 - Laserfiche WebLink

333 Mr. Brandes concurred with Mr. Mercer that due to the potential conflict of things related to the election, it may be unproductive to have the citizens' committee before November. He added that he supported the Steering Committee's recommendation but that he would like the citizens' committee to start its work after the elections. Mr. Tarver indicated that it would be in everybody's best interest to start the citizens' committee dialogue at this time and to keep it going. -' It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, to approve all the recommendations of the Steering Committee regarding the formation and operation of the citizens' committee, as set forth in the Staff Report. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmember Butler, Mohr, and Tarver NOES: Councilmember Brandes and Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Mr. Mercer asked the Councilmembers if the City Attorney could be requested to prepare a ballot measure for the November election that would provide: (1) that the citizens' committee process established by the Council be continued; (2) that any decision on the issue of sphere-of-influence extension or annexation be deferred until a Specific Plan for the area is proposed by the citizens' committee; (3) that the citizens' committee proposal be submitted to the vote of the people after such proposal is reviewed by the City Council; and (4) that, if the citizens' committee plan is successful at the ballot, Council process the application through LAFCO. Mr. Brandes commented that the item regarding the sphere-of- influence should be removed from the proposed measure because that has already been passed by the Council. Ms. Mohr indicated that she would support the request if the measure to be drawn by the City Attorney would be considered a draft that the other Councilmembers would be able to make input to. Mr. Butler stated that he would support the proposal if the draft will come back to Council for consideration. 7-10-90 - 17 -