Laserfiche WebLink
102 <br /> <br /> members would not be allowed to miss any meetings since they <br /> already missed the past three meetings. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that she attended the last PRC meeting and <br /> that she supported the recommendation made by Ms. Wagner. <br /> <br /> Ms. Becky Dennis, 838 Gray Fox Circle, indicated her support <br /> for Ms. Wagner's recommendation. She stated that she would favor <br /> whatever would be necessary to ensure that the PRC's plan and the <br /> provisions of Measure M would not be subject to any future legal <br /> challenge that could invalidate the entire process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler stated that he recognized the merits of the <br /> proposal but that he did not understand how any implication could <br /> be made that the process by which the PRC was established was not <br /> fully open to the public. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brandes concurred with Mr. Butler. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rick Dobbs, 3616 Portsmouth Court, disagreed with Mr. <br /> Butler. He stated that since he supported Measure N, joining the <br /> PRC presented a personal conflict of interest he could not <br /> overcome. He expressed his support for the Committee's efforts to <br /> come up with a Ridgelands plan that would best suit Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Mr. Geno Tolari, 9550 Santos Ranch Road, Ridgelands property <br /> owner and co-Chairman of the "No on N" Committee, stated that as a <br /> member of the PRC, he would like to establish the credibility of <br /> the Committee, even if it would require reopening participation in <br /> the Committee. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sharrell Michelotti, 7873 Olive Court, indicated her <br /> support for Ms. Wagner's proposal. She pointed out that the ballot <br /> did not specify that the Ridgelands would be reviewed by an <br /> existinq committee. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarvet congratulated the "Yes on M" and "No on N" <br /> Committees. He agreed with Mr. Butler's statements that the <br /> formation of the Committee was thoroughly discussed and added that <br /> the language of the ballot measure clearly indicated that a <br /> committee was in place and would continue to work. He stated that <br /> the credibility of the PRC and the outcome of the process are <br /> broader issues and that he supported reopening participation in the <br /> Committee since he would like to see as much citizen involvement as <br /> possible on the Committee. <br /> <br /> - 4 - <br /> 11-20-90 <br /> <br /> <br />