My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN031991
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
CCMIN031991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:13 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 11:17:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
102 <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver commented that while the City, as water supplier, <br /> should have done its own research on the water situation before -- <br /> approving the construction of new buildings, Zone 7 has continually <br /> assured the City that there would be adequate water supply through <br /> the City's General Plan build-up. He proposed that Staff conduct <br /> a research on the amount of water the State and Zone 7 can <br /> realistically provide so the City can come up with contingency <br /> plans for its residents. He added that projects whose designs and <br /> PUD processes have been approved still have to take out building <br /> permits and get Growth Management approval before they can start <br /> construction. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer commented that having a moratorium on building <br /> construction will not mean that there will be no rationing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Tracy stated that Clause 18B of Zone 7's contract with the <br /> State indicates that the State will deliver water if it is <br /> available. She added that although the State Water Report shows <br /> that the State has contracted to deliver 4.3 million acre feet of <br /> water per year, the diagram shows that the State has a capacity of <br /> only 2.2 million acre feet. Zone 7 receives about 1% of the State <br /> Water Project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr inquired if entitlements are made for gravel quarries <br /> and if these are subject to rationing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Tracy replied that gravel quarries and agricultural users <br /> are major pumpers who do not have to account to Zone 7. She added <br /> that these users are not subject to rationing and may pump as much <br /> water as they wish. She explained that the Federal government <br /> controls four times the amount of water the State controls and has <br /> contracts with large businesses with water rights that they would <br /> forfeit if they do not use the water. The Governor could preempt <br /> the Federal contracts and reassign the water if a State water <br /> emergency is declared. The reassignment of 10% to 15% of <br /> agricultural water would mean 100% more for urban users. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver inquired if Staff is proposing that the City take <br /> an average of all users and indicate the number of gallons each <br /> user would get or if the City will request all users to cut back <br /> 25% from last year's usage for the coming month and 50% thereafter. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta replied that what Staff is proposing in the <br /> conceptual program are goals. This notice to be sent to the user <br /> will include the user's personal consumption history as well as the <br /> goal the user will be asked to meet. The program does not consider <br /> a straight 25% cutback across the board; it suggests some averages <br /> based on what the average household use is and comes down by 25% or <br /> 50%. Individual appeals can be made for those with larger families <br /> <br /> - 32 - <br /> 3-19-91 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.