CCMIN070291 - Laserfiche WebLink

284 Mr. Tarver asked staff if this modification is an exception because of the area or if it applies throughout the City. Mr. Swift replied that at the time the PUD was approved, Staff was having some difficulty enforcing the no-banner rule for temporary signs. He explained that the condition was written to emphasize that banners may not be displayed. He added that the action being proposed at this time is basically a "clean-up" of a PUD condition that included too many things. Ms. Scribner felt that the modification conforms to what City policy is at the present time. It was moved by Mr. Tarver, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1512 be introduced, to be read by title only, and waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-89-6-3M, the application of Spieker Partners for a major modification to the approved planned unit development for Rose Pavilion (Phase III), located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Santa Rita Road and Rosewood Drive, to permit banners, pennants, and non- reflective decorations in conjunction with grand openings and special events if found to be in conformance with the City's provisions for temporary conditional use permits, as set forth in the Staff Report. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 6b Approval of Plans and SDecifications and Authorization to Call for Bids for the Senior Center and Related Improvements to be Located on a 187-Acre Site on the West Side of Sunol Boulevard Opposite Mission Drive Consider Adoption of a Negative Declaration This item was continued to the August 6, 1991 City Council Meeting. - 4 - 7-2-91