Laserfiche WebLink
180 <br /> <br /> as possible and that Environmental Impact Report (EIR) mitigation <br /> measures have been incorporated in the plan. He indicated that <br /> Mr. Chris Truebridge from Shapell Industries of Northern <br /> California, Mr. Jeff Holmwood from Bissell & Karn, Engineers, <br /> Mr. Frank Berlogar and Mr. Ray Skinner from Berlogar Geotechnical <br /> Consultants, and Mr. Robert Willett, attorney for Ms. Roselma <br /> Bonde, were present to answer any questions on the project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked Staff for a clarification of Condition No. 38 <br /> on water rationing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that Condition No. 38 in the original <br /> conditions, which was added to the project by the Planning <br /> Commission, would not allow the issuance of building permits if <br /> City goes into mandatory water rationing. He added that when the <br /> City Council addressed that issue on the Moller project, Staff had <br /> recommended that Council address the issue on a City-wide, rather <br /> than a project, basis. The condition was deleted by Council. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver inquired if the open spaces would be maintained by <br /> a landscaping or assessment district or by the property owners <br /> association. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that the open spaces have been conditioned <br /> to be owned and maintained by a homeowners association. He added <br /> that there could also be an easement for a landscape and lighting <br /> district. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver inquired if the property owner had an opportunity <br /> two years ago not to renew the Williamson Act Contract for another <br /> ten years. <br /> <br /> Mr. Peteira replied that the Williamson Act Contract for the <br /> Bonde Ranch has never been renewed. He added that there was a <br /> provision in 1983 that allowed for the non-renewal of the <br /> Williamson Act Contract and that some property owners applied for <br /> that. However, as a result of court decisions, that provision was <br /> stricken, and those properties that applied for that had to go back <br /> and reapply for cancellation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver indicated that he recalls reading a higher level of <br /> service for the Bernal Avenue/Stanley Boulevard intersection in a <br /> traffic study for another project. He inquired if there have been <br /> other projects in the area that caused the level of service to <br /> increase. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that he was not aware of any changes other <br /> than what is stated in the EIR, which is based on the Traffic <br /> Report of January 1990. <br /> <br /> - 4 - <br /> 5-21-91 <br /> <br /> <br />