Laserfiche WebLink
57 <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Mohr <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, that <br />Ordinance No. 1522 be introduced, to be read by title only and <br />waiving further reading thereof, approving PUD-91-8 <br />Russell K, Schaeffer, application to rezone a 1.4± acre parcel <br />located at 5059 Foothill Road from the "A" (Agricultural) to the <br />PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Medium Density Residential <br />District and for development plan approval for a five lot single- <br />family residential development. <br />The roll cal~ vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Mohr <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Item 6d <br />AP-91-07/UP-91-20, James Griffen; ADDeal Of a Plannina COmmiSSion <br />denial without DreiudiCe of a COnditional Use Permit for a <br />secondary unSt to be located at 1 Roman Eaale Way. (SR 91:411) <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br />application. <br /> <br /> Mr. James Griffen, 1 Roman Eagle Court, Pleasanton, wished to <br />clarify some points on the staff report. The report speaks of a <br />carport on this plan, however, it was the previous plan that had <br />the carport. The plan under consideration does not have one. On <br />the project description, the plan shows two buildings, however, the <br />future R.V. storage is not a part of this application either. This <br />application is for a "granny flat" only. There is also a comment <br />regarding interference with existing views, yet the views that <br />would be interfered with are not primary views of any of the <br />residences. It was suggested by the Planning Staff that the <br />secondary dwelling unit be put in the basement of the existing <br />unit. The existing basement does not have a full eight foot <br />ceiling. It is not the intent to make a multiple housing unit out <br />of the residence but rather to construct two separate residences. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler wanted assurance that all Mr. Griffen wanted <br />Council to deal with is the conditional use permit for a secondary <br />unit dwelling that is 15 feet high and one story only. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked Staff if this application should go through <br />the process again since it appears that what is in the staff report <br />is not actually what Mr. Griffen is stating he wants. <br /> <br />10-01-91 11 <br /> <br /> <br />