Laserfiche WebLink
56 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and 'seconded by Mr. Tarver, that <br /> Ordinance No. 1521 be introduced, to be read by title only and <br /> waiving further reading thereof, approving RZ-91-6, City of <br /> Pleasanton, application to prezone an approximately 560 acre site <br /> located east of Hearst Drive and south of Red Feather Drive to the <br /> PUD (Planned Unit Development) - Rural Density Residential District <br /> and Open Space or to any other zoning district consistent with the <br /> General Plan. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Mohr <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6c <br /> PUD-91-8 (RZ-91-3], Russell K, Schaeffer; Application to rezone a <br /> 1,401± acre parcel located at 5059 Foothill Road from the <br /> (Agricultural} to the PUD (planned unit Development) - Medi~lm <br /> Density Residential DistriCt add for development plan aDDroyal for <br /> a five lot sinqle-family residential development. (SR 91:409) <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the <br /> application. <br /> <br /> There being no testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public <br /> hearing closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarvet posed a question to Staff regarding what the zoning <br /> is of the property north and south of this property. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift answered that to the north is the Bridgman-Hutton <br /> Project which is a PUD. The lots range in size from 8500 sq. ft. <br /> and larger. To the south is the Highland Oaks Subdivision zoned <br /> R-1 6500 and those lots range from 6500 sq. ft. on the flatter <br /> areas to quite large lots on the cul-de-sacs. The ones on Forest <br /> Hill Drive are slightly narrower and smaller than the ones proposed <br /> here. <br /> <br /> Responding to some confusion of Exhibit "A" - Plans and Design <br /> Guidelines, presented in the Staff report, Mr. Swift pointed out <br /> the various aspects of the rezoning on the map projected on the <br /> screen. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that <br /> Resolution No. 91-168 be adopted, based on a review of an initial <br /> environmental impact study done for this project and on a finding <br /> that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in <br /> the City's guidelines and on further finding that a negative <br /> declaration is appropriate in connection with PUD-91-8 (RZ-91-3), <br /> Russell K. Schaeffer. <br /> <br /> 10-01-91 10 <br /> <br /> <br />