CCMIN020492 - Laserfiche WebLink

75 The Council present was unanimous that it wanted to look more closely a the specific lot sizes throughout the area; however, it wanted to see minimum 15,000 square feet lots near the existing Ventana Hills homes. Except where the contours of the property dictated a different result, 12,000 square feet lots for the School District property is acceptable. Condition D Desianatinq the ma~or collector street as a two-~ane, stop-siqn controlled collector with no turn lanes, and rural deSiqn. Condition E Desianatina the street tO the Lund II property as a ma~or collector oer Condition D, Council agreed that the Lund Ranch II street would be a local street design, except that if an additional access is not provided from Lund Ranch II this street should be designed as a major collector street. Condition F Locatin~ the storm channel. multi-DurDosed trail. Council agreed to locating the storm drain channel, multi- putposed trail south of the channel. Conditig~ G Future collector street connectin~ to South Pleasanton. Council approved a future collector street to south Pleasanton but no further direction (alignment) for the street was provided at this time. Condition H Local street connectinq tO ~he nOr~. Mr. Tarver felt that the neighborhoods did not need to be connected and should remain closed. Mayor Mercer agreed with Mr. Tarver but added that there should be pedestrian and emergency access. Ms. Scribner supported opening these street and having the connections. She viewed Pleasanton not as a collection of individual pockets of homes but rather as a continuous pattern of connected neighborhoods. Mr. Butler indicated that this Council, as well as previous ones, had made some serious planning mistakes in establishing neighborhoods that were isolated. There are far too many of these examples in town. Independence and San Antonio were designed for 2/4/92 21