CCMIN072192 - Laserfiche WebLink

149 Mayor Mercer describedthe different routes taken to go around this intersection. He believed that placing a diverter in this area would make traffic circulation difficult. He did not feel that it was necessary to completely block this major intersection. Mayor Mercer supported placing a traffic signal at this intersection. Mr. Butler agreed that he would rather have a traffic signal at this location. He asked what the traffic counts were for this intersection. Mr. van Gelder said that the total daily count using the intersection was approximately 1000. Most of the traffic was not going through the intersection but were going up and down Chabot Drive. Ms. Mohr did not find the "worm" diverter a problem. She agreed that a change needed to be made to that intersection but was not sure that a signal was the answer. There was general discussion on the different directions and routes taken through and around this intersection. It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, approving the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Stoneridge Drive at Chabot Drive. The r011 call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Scribner ABSTAIN: None Item 6b Review of Permits and Rates for Taxicabs This item was continued to the 8/18/92 City Council meeting. Item 6c RS-92-2, City of ~leasanton Consideration of a Proposed Amendment to Chapter 18,100 of the Municipal Code to Allow the Temporary Use of Banners for Reliqious Institutions (SR92:308) Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application. There being no testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing closed. 7/2~/92 ?