My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060292
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN060292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
58 <br /> <br /> that outdoor dining was nice. He presented photos to Council of <br /> other cities' downtowns and pointed out the difference it makes <br /> between flexible zones and wider sidewalks. He believed it would <br /> be to the merchants' advantage to have wider sidewalks especially <br /> for the coming farmers market. Mr. Bronzini also expressed <br /> concern about maintenance of the planters in the flexible zones. <br /> He questioned the practicality of a flexible zone. Mr. Bronzini <br /> indicated that flexible zoning is seasonal and asked who would be <br /> responsible for maintenance of this. He stated that flexible <br /> zoning was experimental and did not believe that downtown <br /> Pleasanton should be the test site. He also believed that the <br /> "step curb" concept was not in character with the downtown. He <br /> asked Ms. Acosta if a study was ever completed on the traffic of <br /> downtown with diagonal parking. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta answered that there was a traffic study done and <br /> that later this evening the Chief of Police would make a <br /> presentation on it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bronzini was in favor of diagonal parking but would <br /> surrender the parking for wider sidewalks. Mr. Bronzini referred <br /> to the extra 35 parking spaces created by diagonal parking and <br /> asked what would happen to them if a business used flexible zoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Freedman answered that the some spaces would be lost and <br /> others converted to parallel parking. <br /> <br /> Frank Brandes, 6889 Corte Sonada, stated that it was important <br /> to recognize that the objective was not necessarily to change Main <br /> Street but to revitalize it. He concurred with Joyce Getty's <br /> comments and felt that Option D was the most appropriate plan and <br /> gave the most flexibility for the present and future time. <br /> <br /> Bill Hirst, 235 Main Street, generally supported the Task <br /> Force's recommendations. He believed that Option D would be the <br /> best compromise and was in support of it. He felt that trees in <br /> the downtown would soften the atmosphere and have a lot to do with <br /> the ambiance'and character of the area. He asked for Council to <br /> include provisions for irrigation of the trees that would be <br /> planted. <br /> <br /> Ruby Greer, 444 Main Street, Main Street Spirits and Deli, <br /> listed the different committees she had been involved with in the <br /> past several years. She stated that when the flexible zone was <br /> first presented to her she fully supported it but after visiting <br /> other cities which were using the flexible zoning she developed <br /> great concerns. Her concerns were: noise and fumes from cars; <br /> difficult to clean; dangerous to diners; loss of parking spaces and <br /> it was not known how many businesses in downtown would use the <br /> flexible zone and asked what the cost would be to businesses for <br /> using it. <br /> <br /> 6/2/92 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.