My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090192
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN090192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
22 <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr agreed with Mayor Mercer's concern. She said that <br /> there would soon be candidates night debates and there would be a ' <br /> variety of presentations of these numbers. If there was a clear <br /> understanding of these numbers it would be easier for the public to <br /> understand. <br /> <br /> This item will be discussed at a subsequent City Council <br /> meeting. <br /> <br /> 9, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> LAVWMA/TWA <br /> ABAG <br /> ACAP/ACTEB <br /> Alameda County Waste Management Authority <br /> Alameda County Transportation Plan Committee <br /> Mayor' s Affordable Housing Task Force <br /> Tri-Valley Transportation Council <br /> League of California Cities <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler indicated that the next TWA meeting (9/16/92) would <br /> be a public hearing to discuss the Draft EIR for the TWA facility. <br /> The meeting will be continued to a second night in Walnut Creek <br /> (9/22/92) . <br /> <br /> 10- MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br /> There were none. <br /> % <br /> <br /> 1~, LEGISLATIVE UPDATE REPORTS <br /> There were none. <br /> <br /> ~. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> ~leasanton General Plan Working Paper - ~1 (IR92:64) <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked if the units that were built in the last five <br /> years are producing 1.5 persons per household, where the General <br /> Plan average is 2.9 persons. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said that the revision in the population was not <br /> included in this report therefore, there were approximately 5000 <br /> people not accounted for. The starting point in 1985 was too high <br /> but the ending point was correct. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver referred to Tables I and IV of the staff report and <br /> indicated that the population increase numbers did not match. He <br /> asked what the difference was. <br /> <br /> 9/1/92 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.