My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN011293
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CCMIN011293
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:51 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:01:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
39 <br /> <br />complaints in the future and was to the City's benefit. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr inquired what protection distances are provided for <br />other Bay Area airports. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee indicated that other airports have not been protected <br />and development is encroaching little by little, creating problems <br />for the airport operations. He stated that San Jose is now having <br />to spend its money and FAA funds to buy back properties near the <br />airport due to the change to an international airport. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr then relayed information she had received about a <br />proposed jet repair facility at the Livermore airport. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee said there are no plans now, however that would not be <br />unreasonable or unlikely since there are business jets using the <br />airport. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked what the projected percentage of increase in <br />operations for the airport would be. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee said in the next decade about 25%. By 2011 there <br />could be 430,000 operations per year compared to 220,000 now. The <br />master plan governs what activity is allowed and before the maximum <br />was reached, a new master plan would have to be prepared. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the operations double as projected, will the <br />airport lengthen runways or add new ones? <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee said the runways are built to the full extent of the <br />master plan now. There might be additional hangers or tie down <br />space as needed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico indicated he would like Livermore or the Airport <br />Commission to make that a binding condition in view of the fact <br />that the master plan can be changed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee did not feel this was necessary and stated the ALUC <br />cannot mandate a binding agreement with the communities. He <br />further stated that if runways were extended, a full EIR would be <br />required. <br /> <br /> The question of extending the protection area into Livermore <br />was raised again. Mr. Pico indicated it seemed logical to have two <br />flight corridors available. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lee understood that, however again raised the issue of <br />prevailing winds which dictate that most flights go over <br />Pleasanton. <br /> <br />1/12/S3 <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.