Laserfiche WebLink
193 <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver believed that all of the property owners have had ample opportunities to <br />review, study and have input on this plan. He stated that Measure M did not guarantee <br />anything. He supported placing the Agreement on the ballot and let the citizens decide what <br />they want. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis supported the Agreement and placing it on the ballot. She objected to the <br />City, in fear of lawsuit, should not do anything. She disagreed that changes could not be made <br />to this Agreement because there are three entities involved. This Agreement can be terminated <br />at any time if all three parties agree that it is no longer needed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt that an MOU between the County, Pleasanton and Hayward sets up a <br />process for regional planning and provides the ability for further study and modification of the <br />agreement with concurrence of each of the entities involved. He supported placing this on the <br />November ballot. He added that this is a culmination of a process that was directed by the prior <br />Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr was not opposed to having this Agreement, but was concerned with not putting <br />it through a review process. This would mean that it will not be known if the Agreement is the <br />only or best way of dealing with this matter. She was concerned with not having a limit and <br />potential litigation costs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that the agreement should be in concept at this point. We would enter <br />into the agreement pursuant to what was approved by Hayward and Alameda County. He <br />wanted to find a provision acceptable to all parties regarding indemnification and to limit <br />Pleasanton's liability. If a termination clause is desired, then do that as well. He wanted to give <br />the City Attorney flexibility for negotiations. The City would not enter into the agreement <br />unless the voters adopt the general plan amendment in November. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush proposed wording for a motion to approve the agreement as presented and <br />directing staff to negotiate with Hayward and Alameda County regarding indemnification and <br />how the agreement could be amended. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush asked for clarification concerning the boundaries of the Exhibit to the <br />Agreement. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mayor Tarver, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, to approve the Agreement <br />in concept, to adopt the boundaries as adopted by Hayward and to direct staff to work with <br />Hayward and Alameda County concerning indemnification and amendments. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: Councilmembers Mohr and Scribner <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />08/04/93 5 <br /> <br /> <br />