Laserfiche WebLink
80 <br /> <br /> Item 6b <br /> Isabel Avenue Extension Draft Environmental lmUact Report. (IR93:57) <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken by the Council on this item. <br /> <br /> Item 6c <br /> Recommended City Position on MTC and CMA Guidelines for GrOwth Management <br /> <br /> This item was continued the June 22, 1993 Special City Council meeting. <br /> <br /> Item 6d <br /> Review of Guidelines for Determlnin~ Whether Proposed PUD Changes Should be <br /> Processed as Minor or Ma_ior Modifieation~ <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked for clarification on the criteria used for the determination of the type <br /> of modification needed. <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken by the Council on this item. <br /> <br /> Council took a break at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> Council reconvened at 9:07 p.m. <br /> <br /> Item 6e <br /> Aeeentance of Well Drillin~ Contract for WeB No. 8 and Approval of A?rt~ment With <br /> DSRSD for Joint Use (SR93:255) <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> There was considerable discussion on the usage during a drought and the benefits this <br /> well would bring to the City. <br /> <br /> In response to Council' s concerns and questions, Mr. Cusenza interpreted sections of the <br /> agreement. He further explained that this Well gives Pleasanton the ability to pump the <br /> independent quota from an independent source and in the event of a drought, be able to pump <br /> more out of the groundwater basin. The existing wells can pump approximately 50% of the <br /> demand (non-stop, 365 days/year) at this time and this Well will provide an additional 15 % of <br /> demand (approximately). This well would perhaps meet the needs of the City should all "back <br /> logged"units be built. Mr. Cusenza referred to the quality of water and stated that it would <br /> <br /> 06/15/93 8 <br /> <br /> <br />