CCMIN072999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Acosta felt that would be a second step. Ms. Acosta believed that Mayor Tarver wanted the motion to include bringing back the Spotorno project at the same time and she did not hear that in Ms. Michelotti's motion. Ms. Michelotti stated she just wanted to pursue the development agreement that will move Council off the impasse as Kay and Ben wanted. Her additional request is to look at the other projects in process. She did not mean that a development agreement for them had to be brought back. She just wanted the information. She was not requiring everything to be done on the Spotorno project when this development agreement is brought back for review. The only items that Council would pursue is what is in the Specific Plan as to ranges, or whatever. When we look at the development agreement, then we have to deal with it. She was not requesting that the PUD be approved at the same time. Mayor Tarver said there is a process he is trying to accomplish and he would like to give staff direction to get on with it as quickly as possible. He believes the developer has an interest and will work diligently to get this done. Ms. Michelotti separated her previous motion. It was moved by Ms. Michelotti, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to direct staff to bring information back on what projects are in the process so Council knows who is knocking at the door at the same time as the proposed development agreement. Mr. Pico asked what was meant by "in the process." Mr. Swift felt Council was interested in those projects that might be effected by the CAPP initiative and those are listed in the draft staff report regarding the initiative. Mayor Tarver said all those projects may be in the process, but what has a realistic change of coming before Council before November? Mr. Swift said there are about sixteen real applications. The majority will be before the Planning Commission and City Council before November if processed in the normal time. Ms. Acosta suggested that the motion that is closest to getting a majority vote is the Mayor's suggestion. Staff could soon bring back a list of projects in the process. She repeated the motion as "pursuing the development agreement, pursuing completion of the PUD prior to November 1, calling for the election for November 16m'', and then in the next couple of meetings staff can bring back a list for Councilmember Michelotti of all the projects that are in the process that could get here before CAPP. Ms. Ayala seconded that motion. Pleasanton City Council 20 07/29/99 Special Meeting