CCMIN072999 - Laserfiche WebLink

The motion died for lack of a second. If CAPP passes, then these projects would have to go to the voters for approval. He felt the Spotorno/Summerhill project would be approved, the projects related to the golf course would get approved, and he was unsure about the New Cities project. If it is not, then it would have to come back with a plan that could be approve& He felt those items could be on the ballot in March 2000. The main issue is the guarantee of the bypass road and whether the City wants to invest additional money subject to reimbursement. The issue of the developers paying for the water and sewer infrastructure would be part of whether or not their projects are approved by the voters. Mayor Tarver said there is nothing in his proposal to suggest what the outcome will ultimately be. Council needs to take action on the projects before the annexation vote. Council needs to decide what Council is going to do to get an affirmative vote on annexation. That can be done by development agreement, PUD approval, approval of a bypass road for the Spotorno property, New Cities property and the golf course, or you can drop a section of the road and have the city pay for it. There is nothing to suggest what Council's ultimate decision will be, but it must be made before November 1 st. It was moved by Ms. Michelotti to direct staff to pursue a development agreement similar to what is proposed that will guarantee the bypass road, will guarantee water and sewer infrastructure with no additional payment by the City, and for staff to provide information on other projects that are in the process so she has that information before her when she votes for this package. The motion died for lack of a second. Mayor Tarver clarified that staff was to pursue this development agreement and other items and there would be another item on the agenda that would give information about everything else pending. Ms. Dennis asked if staff would be contacting people who have expressed an interest in having a development agreement. Ms. Acosta clarified that the motion was to pursue a development agreement that guarantees the bypass road and the water and sewer payment and that staff bring back information on other projects that are currently in process and Council would look at whether it wanted to pursue development agreements. Ms. Dennis said her point in asking that staff contact the representatives of other developers is that they have ideas about what they want to see in a development agreement. Pleasanton City Council 19 07/29/99 Special Meeting