CCMIN072999 - Laserfiche WebLink

there is a process that is followed for a public hearing and a vote. He wants to see the golf course completed and the approval of what is before Council now. He does not have that desire for anything else. If staff brings a proposal for the Vineyard Corridor forward, then he will vote on it. Ms. Acosta pointed out that staff has been telling folks that it will not work on development agreements unless there is Council direction to do it. Council has made it clear to staff it is not excited about development agreements as a whole. Staff needs some kind of direction from Council to work on any other development agreements. It was moved by Ms. Ayala to direct staff to work on this development agreement with the suggestion that the construction of the sewer and water infrastructure be done by the developer, drop the $1.2 million cap, and ask other members of Council to suggest what they would like contained in the agreement. The motion failed for lack of a second. Mr. Pico wanted a guarantee that the bypass road is built before the golf course is opened. Ms. Michelotti wanted the motion to include the provision that if Council reviews this agreement, that it also review other development agreements. Ms. Ayala said that is not part of her motion. She only wanted to deal with what is before Council, to direct staff to work on a development agreement and bring it back to Council. She asked Ms. Michelotti if she had requests for this particular agreement. Mayor Tarver wanted options on growth management in terms of large project as a collective body vs. first-come, first-served, because of the infrastructure and timing. Mr. Roush said the Mayor had indicated that he wants to see the development agreement only in context of a PUD plan and asked if that was part of Ms. Ayala's motion. The current proposal does not include a PUD plan for Spotorno. Mayor Tarver was concerned that the review process is not sacrificed. Mr. Pico had concerns about the New Cities plan. If Mr. Spotorno brings a proposal before Council, Mayor Tarver did not want the development agreement to preclude a review of the project. Mr. Roush did not feel a detailed review of a proposal could be done without a PUD plan. A condition that it be consistent with the Specific Plan could be included, but a review would not be as clear as if the development plan were actually before Council. Ms. Ayala asked if the Spotorno plan will come before Council soon. Pleasanton City Council 17 07/29/99 Special Meeting