CCMIN060199 - Laserfiche WebLink

site. She did not understand why the site had to be moved. She said there would be a better flow of traffic if the school is not opened until the road is aligned. Brian McGuire, 233 Del Valle Court, did not feel he had been treated fairly. He was promised his property would remain low density residential he agreed to be annexed. To date he has not been able to exercise his fights as a property owner of a low-density residential parcel. He felt this was unfair and in bad faith. He has repeatedly asked the City to put an end to this process. He said his property has always been low density and no one has objected to the property staying that way. He saw no reason why his property should be joined with the other properties in this Specific Plan. He asked Council to keep his property separate. Ms. Michelotti asked how many units were on his property. Mr. McGuire said nine. Dee Klein, 1752 Tanglewood Way, also had a concern with the traffic that will be generated by the school. She would like a traffic study done before the school site is fmalized. Sheila Fagliano, 1364 Vineyard Avenue, said she has lived next to the Foleys for approximately ten years. She saw no impact to the rtmning of the cattle ranch and felt dividing her lot in the northern section would not affect the ranch. She would like to be treated fairly. Ms. Michelotti asked, when she purchased the property was the County restriction part of the deed. Ms. Fagliano said no, nor was it disclosed to her. There being no further speakers the public heating was closed. Ms. Ayala had a concern with the school. She was not comfortable with using the old road as a temporary access. She would like to know what options are available to have the by-pass road constructed at the same time the school is constructed. She was happy to find out that Signature is responsible for 40% of the by-pass road; the School District is responsible for 40% and the remaining 20% would be divided up amongst the developers, the City and property owners. Ms. Michelotti asked if staff knew how much the 20% would be for the road infrastructure. Mr. Rasmussen said it is 20% of $4.8 million, which would be approximately $960,000. This is the portion that the residential and park development would pay for. There is a proposal that city staff has been reviewing for the construction of 28 homes in the western portion of the plan area. The property owners would like this plan implemented as soon as possible and would be willing to help pay their portion of the infrastructure costs. Ms. Michelotti asked which parcels are included in the 20%. Pleasanton City Council 9 06/01/99 Minutes