CCMIN031699 - Laserfiche WebLink

of certain stucco material from the Planning Department's file that needed to be returned. He said when he went to the Planning Department to request a copy of the stucco materials he signed a piece of paper stating that he would return the attachment within thirty days. He also asked for a replica to be made. He felt he deserved a copy of the materials and asked Council to direct staff to make a copy for him. Mr. Swift said he would have staff look into the matter of the grading plan. He said the letter does state the stucco materials needed to be returned within thirty days. Staff will look into making Mr. Nelson a copy. Pat Nelson, 8088 Bethel Lane, said the minutes for the January 5 Council meeting are still not correct. She is concemed that the minutes do not read anything like what was approved that evening even after she submitted changes she wanted made. She asked for one or two sentence additions in seven places, but only one was put in. She felt her requests were critical to the meaning. On another note, she said plans were submitted in June and September and felt the issues had been resolved, but the plans have been rejected again. She did not understand. She understood there was no palette of colors, so she asked the Planning Department for the original stucco samples that were submitted for approval. She wanted to be able to compare it to the paint chips of the color she is not supposed to be using. She was told by the Planning Department that they are unable to find the stucco colors. She said none of this makes sense. She does not want to keep bringing this issue up, but she can't stop until the record gets corrected. She said Council has been elected to direct staff, which it did, and then to ensure that that direction is followed. Ms. Acosta said the motion was to amend the minutes if, after reviewing the tapes, staff found the tapes in effect verified what the Nelsons were saying. Staff went through the process and amended the minutes based on the comments that staff could verify. Ms. Nelson said her statements are accurate and can be verified by the tape. Ms. Michelotti asked if it was possible to attach the verbatim transcript to the January 5 minutes. Ms. Acosta said it is possible but if Council continually gets requests for verbatim minutes from individuals who are not satisfied with the minutes, producing the minutes could become very difficult. Ms. Michelotti said this would be a one time only case. Mr. Roush said the City Clerk prepared over the weekend a verbatim of the January 5 meeting. The City Clerk, City Manager and City Attomey compared the minutes that had been approved to the Nelsons' request. He felt the revised minutes incorporated the Nelsons' Pleasanton City Council 6 03/16/99 Minutes