CCMIN032499 - Laserfiche WebLink

the people who have lived and worked in Pleasanton for two to three years and those who have lived their entire life in Pleasanton. The top three applicants on Ray Street averaged a mere five years of Pleasanton residency. He felt this was wrong and therefore he approached the Housing Commission. He said most people live here and work somewhere else. He said there was much discussion that led to the proposal that is before the Council tonight. He believed the proposal is much better than the current system. It recognizes people who live in Pleasanton and extends the opportunity to those who work in the Tri-Valley to purchase a home in Pleasanton. Applicants are further distinguished based on their longevity of residence and employment. This did not happen under the old system. The system still maintains special bonus points based on single head of household and physically disabled residents. He felt it was only fair to recognize the long-term residents. He said the proposal passed 4 to 1, the only person voting against it stated "if someone can't afford to live in Pleasanton, then they should move." He said this is the wrong approach to take. He has watched several friends and neighbors leave this town because they cannot afford to live here. He said tonight the Council has a chance to make a difference. He said under the new proposal the top ten applicants are unchanged by staffs recommendation by a mere bonus point. He said if staff's recommendation is adopted, there will be no significant opportunity for long term residents to purchase their first home in Pleasanton. If the City is going to have an affordable housing project, it only seems fair that they include long-term residents. He felt the business fees should not color the debate and ignore the contributions that the people who have grown up in Pleasanton have made. He favored the Commission's proposal that was before the Council tonight. ..... There being no further speakers, the public heating was closed. Ms. Ayala asked staff to elaborate on the nexus between the affordable housing fees collected in Pleasanton. Mr. Bocian said the City assesses an in-lieu affordable housing fee on all new businesses. The money is then used to provide revenue to the lower income housing fund, which is then used to provide support for housing projects within the City. The concern staff has had is that there is an expectation on the part of businesses that their fees are going to be used to provide housing for their employees. The foundation for those fees is based on a nexus between jobs and housing. Staff feels the revenue should be used to ensure a balance between jobs and housing, rather than worrying about the housing jobs/balance that may be occurring in Livermore or other cities in the Tri-Valley area. Mayor Tarver asked the percentage of the lower income housing funds that come from commercial projects. Mr. Bocian said it is significant. Ms. Acosta said the fee is low, but the dollars are high. Pleasanton City Council 6 03/24/99 Minutes