CCMIN081694 - Laserfiche WebLink

The motion died for lack of a second. Council discussed the need to encourage conservation and it was determined that this would be addressed in more detail when staff returns with a report in December. Ms. Mohr expressed her concern that a discount also be provided for those on fixed or reduced income. She was also in favor of grater penalties for excessive water users. She referred to the PG&E rate structure as a good example. Ms. Scribner stated that if water is considered a basic need, then discount for seniors is illogical and it should be more of an economic factor instead. She would support increasing the lifeline allocation or giving discounts to those under a certain income level. She believed there should be some kind of cap to penalize heavy users. It was moved by Mr. Tarver, seconded by Mr. Pico, to adopt Resolution No. 94-97, restoring the 20% senior discount and retaining the tier structure until at least December 1994. The roll call vote was as fOllgwS: AYES: Councilmembers -Dennis, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: Councilmember Scribner ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Council directed staff to bring back some way of regulating irrigation and excessive watering of medians. Mr. Tarver suggested investigation of economic need and adjusting the lifeline rate to be more in agreement with the average use. Ms. Scribner asked that the condition of water meters be investigated. She stated her bills vary a lot and her habits do not vary that much. Ms. Dennis suggested inspection of irrigation systems to be sure they are operating efficiently. Mr. Lum explained problems with older systems and the need to change over to newer, more efficient systems. Ms. Acosta explained the adjustments being made by Prudential to conserve water. 08/16/94 -7-