My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081694
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCMIN081694
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:30 AM
Creation date
5/21/1999 11:35:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and rare; some are never fired. Since Pleasanton has not had problems in this area, it is not <br />necessary to adopt regulations now. <br /> <br /> Herbert Marshall, 3202 Clifford Circle, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance <br />for the same reasons. <br /> <br /> John Metzler, 3513 Churchill Court, spoke in opposition to any regulation of gun <br />ownership and cited various historical references. <br /> <br /> Frank B~lecky, 892 Madeira Drive, spoke in support of a ban on assault weapons for <br />private citizens, however he was not in favor of regulations for sporting rifles used for hunting. <br />He a/so believed the federal licensing requirements were adequate. <br /> <br /> George Gunter, 1805 Greenwood Road, asked for clarification on the zero tolerance <br />policy. <br /> <br /> Linda Adams, 159 Ray Street, supported the zero tolerance policy for illegal gun <br />possession and the ban on assault weapons. <br /> <br /> Bert Felix, 2860 Garden Creek Circle, stated there is no clear definition of an assault <br />weapon. He then expressed his opinion that there are greater potential dangers in the home than <br />selling weapons. If Council wishes to prosecute individuals who are selling guns illegally, then <br />the laws already in effect should be enforced. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis indicated she had raised this issue because of comments from citizens and <br />their concerns about persons released from Santa Rita. She further stated that the time to deal <br />with an issue is before it becomes a problem. She believed it was appropriate for Council to <br />set standards to regulate this type of business and that selling guns should be in a done in a <br />commercial area. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver expressed his dislike of guns, but appreciated the Constitutional provisions <br />and issues raised by some members of the audience. He did not want to over-regulate issues <br />already addressed by federal and state laws. He expressed strong feelings about the zero <br />tolerance policy, assault weapons and the pending Crime Bill in Congress. He believed that the <br />criminal activity is of far more concern than people who are dealing with guns in a responsible <br />manner. There is more danger from a person who purchases a gun and doesn't act responsibly. <br />His greatest concern is about those who purchase guns illegally and use them in illegal activities. <br />There is no excuse for that. He suggested forwarding the zero tolerance policy as a resolution <br />to the League of California Cities for action on the state level. He supported restrictions on <br />assault weapons. <br /> <br />08/16/94 <br /> - 10- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.