My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN041994
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
CCMIN041994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:31 AM
Creation date
5/21/1999 11:17:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was moved by Mayor Tarver, and seconded by Mr. Pico, that Ordinance No. 1622 be <br />introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, adding Chapter 1.20 <br />"Campaign Reform" to the Pleasanton Municipal Code, concerning campaign disclosure <br />statemehts: the first two fling deadlines and post-election to be the same as state requirements <br />but a third pre-election filing covering period up to seven days before election with filing due <br />in City Clerk's office four days before an election; and a $25 floor for reporting contributions. <br /> <br /> A substitute motion was made by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, to raise the <br />a contribution limit for reporting purposed to $50. <br /> <br />The r011 Call vote was aS follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr and Scribner <br />NOES: Councilmembers Dennis, Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> The vote was then taken for the original motion. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: - Councilmembers Dennis, Pico and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: Councilmembers Mohr and Scribner <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTA~I: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush clarified that this ordinance will apply to any local election. <br /> <br />6. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />Item 6a <br />Mid-Year Budget Review (SR94: 100) <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> In response to Mr. Pico, Ms. Rossi explained that when the City adopted its budget the <br />State's budget had not yet been adopted. The City projected a $900,000 deficit. As a result of <br />the State adopting its budget, that deficit grew another $500,000. With the savings that is <br />reflected at mid-year, the number has been increased to $700,000. Next year's deficit will be <br />approximately $1.5 million but there is approximately $3.1 million in the recession reserve to <br />cover there deficits. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta added that the City staff has been working very hard to continue to look for <br />ways to make reductions. <br /> <br />04/19/94 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.