Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Dennis stated that there are some future areas that are not designated in the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver commented that the Dougherty Valley was planned. He felt it has to cross <br />the County line and include everything in the Valley, not just what is in our General Plan. <br />Contra Costa has urban limit lines, it has General Plans that should be able to be adopted and <br />say this is what will be serviced. He does not want General Plan changes that are substantial <br />in nature. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis thought DSRSD should service the Dougherty Valley only after servicing <br />East Dublin and other areas. This promotes orderly development without necessarily limiting <br />development. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet stated that DSRSD has talked about servicing the Dougherty Valley and <br />that is what the contention is. DSRSD did not put it in its original request but now have the <br />opportunity to serve it and it wants capacity it did not ask for. DSRSD believes it is in the <br />service business. That is its job, its mission in life, and it doesn't care about planning or the <br />impacts on citizens. Dougherty Valley has a major problem with sewer and water. It can't get <br />either but it wants to develop now. DSRSD is an agency that can do it if it has capacity. <br />DSRSD when this was coming around ten years ago didn't include Dougherty Valley. With the <br />current agreement it doesn't have the capacity. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if staff had any discussion about what DSRSD wanted as to the RO <br />recycling. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lure stated DSRSD wants to exclude reuse from the in~uent cap. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet replied DSRSD wants to count the effluent and we want to count in~uent. <br />Whether DSRSD wants recycling, wants to service the Dougherty Valley or wants to use RO <br />and sell water to somebody else, we never got to that point. But is there consensus about the <br />traffic mitigation? <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that she would not be opposed to putting that in as a lump sum for the <br />~PIDA entities to divide up among themselves. If they choose to give Hayward that particular <br />amount, it would be their business. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta asked Ms. Mohr if she would vote against it or if the deal was something that <br />finally came together, would she be open to looking at it again? <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that if everything else was something she could accept, except that there <br />had to be a side deal with Hayward, she could accept it. She heard RO is only acceptable if it <br />is used for irrigation. <br /> <br />11/21/95 -28- <br /> <br /> <br />