CCMIN112195 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Swift replied yes. Presley can still proceed with the first half of the project. Mayor Tarver stated that he did not like the design of the project. In terms of living with the spirit of the growth management conditions and working with staff, it previously granted an extension and now its beyond that extension. There has to be a limit, a point in time where it says the units have to come off the books if they are not going to be developed. He is not satisfied with the project as approved and felt he could not extend the request again. Ms. Michelotti stated that if an extension were granted to this project, Presley was willing to try to address the concerns of Council. If then there where changes of some type, what process would have to be gone through? How far can Council go to address some of the concerns by giving the Presley Company an extension and then looldng for modifications. She felt there were benefits from this project and hated Presley not to have a project by not extending the date for the final map. Mr. Swift stated significant changes in the grading, lot size, street orientation or locations would be considered major modifications to the PUD. Ms. Michelotti said if the project goes down and it Starts all over again on these thirty- nine lots, then what type of process does Presley have to go through. Does it need a new F~IR.9 Mr. Swift replied that Presley would have to apply for a new PIJD development plan. If it is the same exact plan, staff would look to see if it could use the same EIR. If the plan is significan~y different, then a new process would need to be done in conjunction with that development plan, tentative map. Then they would apply for growth management approval. Presley has not indicated what changes it might be interested in but is open to making changes. Ms. Mohr quoted the staff report that without the extension the project may not be built because of infrastructure costs. Is that a staff assessment or is that information from the applicant? Mr. Swift replied that the costs for the Phase I portion of the improvements which include the water tank, the Dublin Canyon Road extensions, the grinder pump, the solution for the sewer except for the bridge crossing, and the grading at Foothill Road are expensive and are in Phase I. Without the thirty-nine lots to help carry the costs, the economy will have to get better a lot quicker to make that happen for just 61 lots. Ms. Mohr asked if Laurel Creek Drive would have to go through to Foothill for the first phase for Tract 6400. Mr. Swift stated that the first phase was approved with a single access off Dublin Canyon Road. There is an emergency vehicle access road that was part of the plan extending from the top of the hill in the project to Foothill. 11/21/95 -20-